A mysterious fire last Friday destroys all of the voting machines in Harris County (Houston), Texas. Arson investigators have not yet issued an opinion. Meanwhile, a well-funded right-wing group emerges in Houston and begins raising unfounded allegations of widespread voter fraud. A video on their website pictures only people of color when it talks of voter fraud. White people are shown talking patriotically about the need for a million vigilantes to suppress illegal votes.
In the video, an unidentified spokesman for “TrueTheVote” says, “If we lose Houston, we lose Texas. And guess what? If we lose Texas we lose the country.” The former Mayor of Houston, Democrat Bill White, is running against secessionist Republican Gov. Rick Perry this year. White’s counting on a big turnout in his home town. The fire and the voter suppression campaign guarantee a greatly diminished turnout.
TrueTheVote’s video is well produced. Participants speak in calm and knowing tones, disguising the racist agenda behind their project. We don’t yet know where the group’s money comes from. But they have money.
As I’ve said before, right-wing voter suppression campaigns are the most under-reported political scandal of the last 50-100 years. But there’s never been anything like the criminal destruction of all the voting machines in the nation’s fourth largest city. You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to suspect the machines in Houston were destroyed by an arsonist. Warehouses don’t regularly and spontaneously combust at four in the morning, especially warehouses containing all the voting tools in a pivotal city in a pivotal election.
In other details, the suppression campaigns follow a familiar pattern: raise suspicions of widespread voter fraud. Accuse “others” of stealing elections from us (read: white people). Threaten would-be voters with criminal charges. Limit polling locations in poor and minority precincts. Distribute spurious “felon lists” that disenfranchise legal voters who happen to share a name with a felon. Staff phone banks that make election calls to minority and poor voters giving incorrect polling locations and dates. Dress up vigilantes in cop clothes to intimidate would-be voters.
Regular Huffington Post contributor Greg Mitchell wrote one of the best accounts of such a suppression and intimidation campaign in his book about the 1934 California governor’s race, The Campaign of the Century. At least since then, voter suppression has been a part of nearly every election cycle.
There are simply no machines available to replace the loss of Houston’s machines. That means either a return to paper ballots (there may be very few scanners to count them) or a greatly reduced number of polling locations. The latter would require the emergency suspension of state law and run afoul of the Voting Rights Act. In any case, confusion will reign, and confusion reduces turnout.
What about that TrueTheVote statement, “If we lose Houston, we lose Texas. And guess what? If we lose Texas we lose the country.”? That may be the only true thing TrueTheVote has said. For much of the country, Texas is a vast right-wing breeding ground. Actually, Democrats have nearly reached parity in the state House of Representatives. All the elected officials in Dallas are Democrats. Austin, too. Most of the judges and many of the officials in Houston are Democrats.
With a strong turnout in Houston, White could very well beat Perry. Without a national effort to counter the largest voter suppression effort in my memory, that turnout won’t happen. Even if the fire is ruled accidental, its consequences remain the same. If a great number of Houston voters are disenfranchised as a consequence of the fire and the right’s election vigilante effort, democracy loses, and so does the country.
Keep in mind that population shifts will hand Texas several new congressional seats lost in the Democratic rustbelt. This election will decide the players who will draw new lines in redistricting. The stakes are high. The question is, do Democrats have the will to do battle with right-wing forces who believe they can choose who votes and who doesn’t?

My mother was born in 1917 in Ranger, Eastland County, Texas; she was the youngest of 10 [it may have been 11] children. She related to me, when I was a child, her memories of her father and older brothers carrying their hand guns with them on voting days in Ranger, because of the threats made by crooked politicians against voters to vote in certain ways or to not vote at all. My Grandfather and uncles carried those guns to protect themselves and their right to vote. This took place during the Ranger oil boom from around 1917 to the mid-1920s.
When I lived in Rio Grande City for a short period of time during the Farm Workers Strike {Viva La Huelga!!}, people there told me stories of stolen elections, gun-fights, and multiple killings on election days, with bodies piled-up in the backs of trucks to be taken away. Those events were rather more recent than those of the early 1900s.
Voter intimidation and suppression is a strong, long-standing characteristic of Texas culture, with a long and dishonorable history. I think it all too possible that Democrats in the early part of the immediately past century were deeply involved in the practice. Whether Republicans in Texas are new to the practice or not, Republicans in general have a history of it. For example, William Rehnquist, before R. Nixon appointed him to the Supreme Court in 1971, was a Republican Party apparatchik who challenged/intimidate black voters at polling places in, as I recall, Arizona or Nevada. That took place in the context of a cultural counter-revolution that was not entirely free of gun play and killings.
It is not at all out of the realm of the possible that the destruction of voting machines in Houston was accomplished by Republican Party apparatchiks and supporters. This event has taken place in the context of a Republican thrust to dominate America at any and all costs. They have a lot to lose in Texas if they lose the election for Governor and the Legislature.
When the investigation leads back to a left-wing source acting to thwart the fraud investigation, will you have the guys to post about it and retract these ridiculous accusations against your "right-wing boogeymen"? I think we already know the answer.
I realize in advance that this is a liberal blogsite and truth tends to fade into irrelevance when it runs counter to liberal dogma … but really, Glenn. A group begins alleging voter fraud perpetrated by ACORN-like organizations on a large scale in Houston. Voting machines are part of the evidence. The only way for those allegations to go away is to eliminate the evidence.
Again, I know that truth is irrelevant when you're trying to promote your cause, Glenn. I'm yet to see any of those mean ol' nasty right-wingers carrying clubs and guns outside voting locations to ensure that people of certain ethnicities don't vote. I have, however, seen such a performance from the far left documented.
As a news reporter myself, I've been involved in several investigations and allegations of both voter fraud and voter intimidation over the years here in Texas. In every single instance — EVERY one — it was the liberal cause/candidate trying to cheat. I don't doubt that right-wingers COULD try those tactics, but I'm yet to run across an instance where that has been the case.
Gimme a small break. You mean to tell me that the DAY AFTER "Houston Votes" (read also: A-SCORNED) was caught with their red hands in the cookie jar (red meaning Communist), the fire occurs – and somehow it is the right wingers? Plus you very skillfully forgot to mention the blatant voter intimdation by the NEW Black Panthers. I guess those were just a bunch of white folks in black face, eh?
I fully expect for my Facebook page to be hacked now…LOL. Typical.
Glenn. You have an audience I would not have imagined. Congratulations.
Rainmaker, Rhonda and dave:
Let me see if I understand you. No or fewer voting machines mean liberal, left, progressive and minority voters may not be able to vote in numbers as large as could be expected if the voting machines had not been destroyed. This result helps Republican candidates; it may mean Bill White will lose the election.
Your conclusion: Left-wingers destroyed the voting machines.
Your conclusion makes sense only if lefties want White to lose. Is there any evidence, out there in the universe you live in, that lefties really want White to lose?
Next thing, you guys will be telling us that Muslims are behind the hate mongering directed at the Cordoba Cultural Center in specific and the Islamaphobia madness of right-wing idiots, in general. And that the mosque under construction in Tennessee was torched by the Muslims who are building it.
Doran, would you even consider that the fire was caused for reasons outside your political worldview? Apolitical fires happen everyday. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
You mean like the mosque fire in Tennessee?
Can you name one plausible reason? A jilted lover? A mid-life crises? A retro-Luddite? I'm sure the literature will support the theory that a warehouse full of voting machines is the favorite target of such people.
No, in response to your question. If it was arson, then we have to look at motive. Given what was destroyed, the proximity of a seriously close election, and what is at stake, my theory is that it was arson set by someone who has something to win if the Dems lose the election and will suffer a huge set-back if the Dems win. Wonder who that could be……
But it is just a theory, subject to being proven or disproven.
Oh. You know, don't you, that sometimes a cigar is just a Swisher Sweet and sometimes a cigar is a Cohiba.