When our sideshow news cablists, the White House, the NAACP and others began their carnival barking outside Andrew Breitbart’s tent once again – this time echoing Brietbart’s slander of Shirley Sherrod – the predictable puerility followed. The White House apologized and blamed the media culture, Fox News denied its role, pundits claimed the high ground and called for Sherrod’s reinstatement. The NAACP’s quick admission – “we were snookered” – was the only adult behavior around.
It’s a rare day that Sarah Palin, the Klondike Queen of Kooks, doesn’t get a front-page turn on Huffington Post. Left, Right, Middle or Ozone, commentators of all stripes are mesmerized by the Right. No matter how nutty, nasty or distant from reality, the extremists talk and the whole political sphere gets all rubbernecked.
I’ve fought white conservatives’ annual voter suppression and intimidation campaigns for decades in the South. It was and is hard to get attention on the issue. But let a couple of black guys dressed up as New Black Panthers hang around an African-American polling place in Philadelphia, and FoxNews has America thinking the Liberty Bell down the street has finally fallen apart.
When CBS News’ Bob Schieffer somehow avoided the Right’s hypnotists on this unscandal and failed to make it a subject on “Face the Nation,” Fox’s Megan Kelly was so shocked she attacked Schieffer on the air. That’s how accustomed the Right is to having its daily way with the minds of America’s newsies and pundit class.
I can’t bring myself to say much about Drudge, except how in the hell is it that college-educated journalists let themselves be drug around by the nose by the idiot? Where is their self-respect? Where is their judgment? Where is their common sense?
It’s not enough to pin the blame on the Right’s legendary message machine, the noisy blog-to-talk-to-Fox-to-talk-to-blog circle of hate. By all rights it ought to be a classic closed system. But there’s something else afoot here, Holmes.
How is it that the Right has mesmerized the American media, including some in the Left-leaning media? Part of the answer lies in the great moral leveling of the media itself. The elimination of authentic moral considerations in reporting reduces everything to mushy he said/she said. Anything goes, so long as it’s entertaining.
Political news has been Jerry Springer-ized. This is an old and very un-Springery observation. It remains relevant. Clowns play better than statesmen in today’s news. Everybody knows it, but few do anything about it. Success comes to those with empty heads, no moral compass, and the gift of self-delusion.
There’s a folk legend that hypnosis can’t make anyone do something they’re opposed to morally. If that is the case, America really is in moral danger. Or, more accurately, America is danger because of its moral vacuity.
Cultural memory is essential to social ethics, and America is losing its memory. The Right is busy re-writing the Constitution, confident that very few Americans know what it is. The extremists have yet to find a way to justify torture, domestic spying, federal intervention in our bedrooms, and government control of women’s bodies while prohibiting federal enforcement of the commerce clause. However poor their reasoning, however fact-free their arguments, the major media continues to afford them the benefit of the doubt.
History and memory. They are key to understanding the Right’s hypnotic power over today’s media. The New York Times has a story today about China’s murderous occupation of Tibet. The parallels with the European conquest of the Americas are striking. Really striking. So striking that they ought to be mentioned. But they are not.
That, I think, is a clue to Right’s mesmeric power. History is assigned to another bureau. It is someone else’s beat. The Right gets this, and it promises journalists what logic tells us is impossible: a place in history that requires the erasure of history.
The person who, like Emerson, wants to pierce the rotten diction that is the lifeblood of destructive fantasy is, well, little more than a drag, a bummer, out of touch with the power of anti-history while looking to the lessons of history for some sign of justice.

Help me out, here. The name of the guy who observed and described the ability of the media to co-opt every good idea that comes along, and turn those ideas to the service of the media, the dominant culture, and money-making. Marshall McCluhan? Woody Allen proved the accuracy of the observation, by having his character in Annie Hall carry on a conversation with the real McCluhan about co-opting, while standing in a ticket line at a movie theater.
The situation you describe has been going on for more than 40 years. Right wing publicists understand it and use it. Progressive publicists and politicians either don't understand the phenomena, or don't give a damn, or haven't figured out how to deal with it.
[More after the mandatory "split it into two parts crapola....]
President Obama has the most significant public place in America — the Presidency being a bully pulpit–but he and his helpers don't know how to use it. What the hell?
You make a number of very good points: Maybe you can expand on some them in future postings. I admit to being a bit hesitant about placing too much blame on morality, or the lack thereof, on the part of the Left or Progressive politicians and publicists and media people. I think, without much emprical data to back it up admittedly, that those people are not immoral or amoral to any greater extent than you or I. And I still, after all these years, cannot not-bring to most things I do a sense of what is right and wrong. If you will grant, for the purposes of argument and discussion, that politicians, etc of the Progressive stripe act more rather than less in the same fashion as you and I, then we have to look somewhere else for an explanation for the craven behavior of the media as you've described it.
[More to follow. Damn app.]
In my opinion, the problem is at least two-fold: One, "the media" is not at all progressive or left
wing to any great extent. It is owned and controlled and directed by the Right. And Two,
everybody in "the media", with few exceptions such as those wonderful people at Narco News,
Democracy Now!, and a few others, are there to make a living and to put food, clothes, and a
roof on their children, to paraphrase George II.
Solution? Nothing profound have I to suggest. It is a matter of picking away at the lies and
distortions on a daily basis. The people who will do that are online, not in the editorial rooms of
major newspapers and television stations.
Keep it up, please.
P.S. Please do something about your comment app's reluctance to accept comments that are "a
little too long." It is aggravating to have to split a comment into two or more parts.
Doran and Glen — Well said though all the gaps cause a loss of flow with Dornan's comments. I cont to be amzed by the left, liberal sides inability to understand how to use media to appeal their constituency. I wish everyone would look at the facts and then engage is some sort of rational analyse and then come to a position. Instaed everthing seems to be driven by appeals to emotion and successfully so by the right. What are the words and ideas that would motivate more Americans to support liberal positons, Find them and then use them — drill them into the publc space just like the otehr folks.
You are correct about the way journalistic mores enable this sort of thing, and that conservatives have learned to exploit it. The missing piece of the puzzle, then, is the totally lack of countervailing pull from the left. The Democratic Party seems to continue to believe that splitting with conservatives makes them appear moderate, when really it makes them appear callow and lacking in principle. And too many progressives point to conservative nonsense instead of actually articulating an alternative. Changing either of these things would likely improve the situation, and they also have the remarkable quality of being things we have some control over.
We cannot change conser
Great article and comments. The Right has to be confronted head on. When they lie, expose them and call them liars. Do not call them "disingenuous" or some such term. Explain things better. Example:Death panels. This was merely a provision for a doctor to get paid for his work. Why couldn't anybody say it like that? Ask Sarah Palin if she expects a doctor to work for nothing. People are more practical than ideological. A little sidewalk common sense goes a long way in the South. I would love to discuss this further if anyone is interested.
Bruce Perryman 254-754-3113