<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Prairie Humanism: The (Just Now) Emerging Progressive Movement</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/</link> <description>Politics, Opinion and Culture, for Texas and Beyond</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <item><title>By: Glenn W. Smith</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link> <dc:creator>Glenn W. Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2116</guid> <description>Let me say first and most importantly:  Your work, out front or behind the scenes, should be recognized and honored, and by drawing a distinction between a resistance and a movement I&#039;m not discounting what you&#039;ve done or what I&#039;ve done, for that matter. It&#039;s an artificial distinction, but an important one. Worldview can be left for last, because you can&#039;t adequately &quot;control what issues come up&quot; without speaking the values (which come from worldview) as an integrated part of the issues discussed. Until we&#039;ve coped with the core, the worldview, we&#039;re vulnerable to hijacking, which is how some corporate apologists, for instance, can describe themselves as progressives.I meant the distinction to be jarring, and while I believe in the truth of it, it&#039;s also a distinction employed as a rhetorical strategy. I think we&#039;re in agreement generally, and I want to thank you for your work, your attention, and your kind words re: this piece.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me say first and most importantly:  Your work, out front or behind the scenes, should be recognized and honored, and by drawing a distinction between a resistance and a movement I&#8217;m not discounting what you&#8217;ve done or what I&#8217;ve done, for that matter. It&#8217;s an artificial distinction, but an important one. Worldview can be left for last, because you can&#8217;t adequately &#8220;control what issues come up&#8221; without speaking the values (which come from worldview) as an integrated part of the issues discussed. Until we&#8217;ve coped with the core, the worldview, we&#8217;re vulnerable to hijacking, which is how some corporate apologists, for instance, can describe themselves as progressives.</p><p>I meant the distinction to be jarring, and while I believe in the truth of it, it&#8217;s also a distinction employed as a rhetorical strategy. I think we&#8217;re in agreement generally, and I want to thank you for your work, your attention, and your kind words re: this piece.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Ancona</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2115</link> <dc:creator>Dan Ancona</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2115</guid> <description>@Glenn Yeah we probably agree on a lot of the substance, and I&#039;m reading through your stuff now and it&#039;s great. I just don&#039;t see the rhetorical value of denying the movement exists, when it does, it&#039;s just small and has a long way to go.Re: post-resistance, you familiar with the 3 dimensions of power? Mark Scmitt wrote a good quick summary piece of this in the Prospect a while ago. Basically phase I is resistance, being able to stop bad things. Phase II is being able to control what issues come up, and Phase III is shifting worldview. So we&#039;ve got ok phase I power, occasional phase II power, and are just barely starting on III. In that analysis anyhow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glenn Yeah we probably agree on a lot of the substance, and I&#8217;m reading through your stuff now and it&#8217;s great. I just don&#8217;t see the rhetorical value of denying the movement exists, when it does, it&#8217;s just small and has a long way to go.</p><p>Re: post-resistance, you familiar with the 3 dimensions of power? Mark Scmitt wrote a good quick summary piece of this in the Prospect a while ago. Basically phase I is resistance, being able to stop bad things. Phase II is being able to control what issues come up, and Phase III is shifting worldview. So we&#8217;ve got ok phase I power, occasional phase II power, and are just barely starting on III. In that analysis anyhow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn W. Smith</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link> <dc:creator>Glenn W. Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2112</guid> <description>Well, that&#039;s what I&#039;m saying, that we&#039;re just getting going as a movement, a step beyond a resistance. Maybe should have made that more clear.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying, that we&#8217;re just getting going as a movement, a step beyond a resistance. Maybe should have made that more clear.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Ancona</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2110</link> <dc:creator>Dan Ancona</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2110</guid> <description>Great piece. Yes!But rather than saying the progressive movement doesn&#039;t exist, maybe we could agree to say &quot;we&#039;re just getting started?&quot; I&#039;ve been writing about progressive worldview issues since 2005 or so, and working full time on progressive infrastructure since &#039;06, as have a lot of people. Toiling in obscurity has been fun and all, I&#039;m fine with that and I&#039;m glad Zack&#039;s putting this on everyone&#039;s radar now, but I take less kindly to being told I don&#039;t even exist, and that&#039;s twice now. (one of Zack&#039;s recent pieces did the same thing)That being said, I&#039;m not so sure empathy is really the cornerstone. It has a bit of a weird privilege connotation to it that I find less than helpful. I&#039;d suggest the concept of interdependence instead: it&#039;s not just that we progressives care about other people, it&#039;s that we realize our all of fates are bound up together. Interdependence is, in my view, a little more MLK, and a little less Lakoff &amp; Rifkin, although they&#039;re all important. I have a few preliminary thoughts on this here:http://danancona.blogspot.com/2009/01/foundations-i-interdependence.htmlGlad to see this discussion happening, interesting stuff!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece. Yes!</p><p>But rather than saying the progressive movement doesn&#8217;t exist, maybe we could agree to say &#8220;we&#8217;re just getting started?&#8221; I&#8217;ve been writing about progressive worldview issues since 2005 or so, and working full time on progressive infrastructure since &#8217;06, as have a lot of people. Toiling in obscurity has been fun and all, I&#8217;m fine with that and I&#8217;m glad Zack&#8217;s putting this on everyone&#8217;s radar now, but I take less kindly to being told I don&#8217;t even exist, and that&#8217;s twice now. (one of Zack&#8217;s recent pieces did the same thing)</p><p>That being said, I&#8217;m not so sure empathy is really the cornerstone. It has a bit of a weird privilege connotation to it that I find less than helpful. I&#8217;d suggest the concept of interdependence instead: it&#8217;s not just that we progressives care about other people, it&#8217;s that we realize our all of fates are bound up together. Interdependence is, in my view, a little more MLK, and a little less Lakoff &amp; Rifkin, although they&#8217;re all important. I have a few preliminary thoughts on this here:</p><p><a
href="http://danancona.blogspot.com/2009/01/foundations-i-interdependence.html" rel="nofollow">http://danancona.blogspot.com/2009/01/foundations-i-interdependence.html</a></p><p>Glad to see this discussion happening, interesting stuff!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Kaib</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2100</link> <dc:creator>David Kaib</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2100</guid> <description>Also except these parts of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule_%28ethics%29#Christianity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Leviticus&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also except these parts of <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule_%28ethics%29#Christianity" rel="nofollow">Leviticus</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn W. Smith</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2095</link> <dc:creator>Glenn W. Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:41:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2095</guid> <description>&#039;Cept they skip the part where Paul erases racial and national identity barriers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Cept they skip the part where Paul erases racial and national identity barriers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Cullen</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2093</link> <dc:creator>Jim Cullen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2093</guid> <description>They read through Leviticus, then skip to the epistles of St. Paul.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They read through Leviticus, then skip to the epistles of St. Paul.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn W. Smith</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2092</link> <dc:creator>Glenn W. Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:33:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2092</guid> <description>They don&#039;t actually read the Bible. They just, well, uh, I&#039;m not sure what they do....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t actually read the Bible. They just, well, uh, I&#8217;m not sure what they do&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J.P. Whitefield</title><link>http://www.dogcanyon.org/2010/02/07/prairie-humanism-the-just-now-emerging-progressive-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link> <dc:creator>J.P. Whitefield</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:26:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogcanyon.org/?p=4367#comment-2091</guid> <description>To quote Jesus Christ: &quot;Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.&quot;  Christian Right????</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote Jesus Christ: &#8220;Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.&#8221;  Christian Right????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.dogcanyon.org @ 2010-09-08 10:43:22 -->