As the curtain finally goes up on the election season one full decade into the 21st Century, our politic conversation remains hopelessly mired in the previous century. The complex problems of the contemporary world are ignored as conservatives sneer about states rights, of all things. The Karl Rove generation of the Right hates the sixties, and in their obsession they never left the decade that ended forty years ago.
Even progressives who want to move on are stuck in old habits. Defending against anachronistic right wing attacks, they too are acting in a costume drama or period piece. The message legacy of the 20th Century is dangerously out of date. The Right blames big government for everything. The Left, always on the defensive, fights off accusations of socialism and communism — failed 19th Century models about as relevant as the telegraph. I’ve never met a serious socialist or communist. Any still around are made of straw.
While we’re stuck in the old politics, the corporatists have consolidated real power. A corporatist believes that corporations transcend democratic institutions, safeguards, the public will, checks and balances. He aims for rule by corporation, unfettered by any regulations, voter reprisals or legal accountability. So-called tort reform was about ending public accountability for corporate wrongdoing.
It’s the corporatist who is the real enemy of a free, transparent and open market. I’m a fan of the profit motive, I’m aware of the efficiencies big companies can maintain, efficiencies that improve our quality of life. I am opposed to their absolute political power. People deserve financial reward for risk and accomplishment. Corporatism eliminates its risk, however. Banks’ unregulated and dangerous lending practices caused the Great Recession. Taxpayers were then made to cover their losses. That’s corporatism.
The health insurance industry — an industry that produces nothing of value; it earns all of its profits from the denial of coverage, care and benefits — is the poster child of corporatism. Those corporations that do deliver actual goods or services — the energy industry, for instance — come to believe that the good they do means they are good and blessed to the bone no matter what negative consequences they produce as well. They are so good they, and not an elected government, should be in charge.
This is a blind ideology, of course, and it is how good people — people who care for their families and neighbors — can do bad things, like poison the environment and resent any effort to clean it up.
This fundamental issue — the issue we should be discussing — has been raised recently by three progressive writers: Ed Kilgore in The New Republic, Glenn Greenwald in Salon, Jeffrey Feldman at Daily Kos. Here’s Greenwald on the corporatist merger of government and big business:
In the intelligence and surveillance realms, for instance, the line between government agencies and private corporations barely exists. Military policy is carried out almost as much by private contractors as by our state’s armed forces. Corporate executives and lobbyists can shuffle between the public and private sectors so seamlessly because the divisions have been so eroded. Our laws are written not by elected representatives but, literally, by the largest and richest corporations. At the level of the most concentrated power, large corporate interests and government actions are basically inseparable.
Jeffrey Feldman says this:
In our politics, very loud participants in the debate do not agree with this basic idea. There are currents of conservative thought extending all the way back to the founding of the republic that argue against the power of government over private land holders, and slaveholders, and monopoly holders–and shareholders. These currents have found their expression in a politics of the right in this country that has and still does call for the dismantling of our government in order to advance a specific alternative: an America in which the constitution forbids government to encompass private business.
Feldman recommends democratic capitalism with a constitutional separation of private corporations and the state, by that he means the government shouldn’t be swallowed by or become the mere servant of unaccountable corporatists. We are at that point today.
The trouble is, stuck in old, worn-out, 19th and 20th Century arguments, neither the Left nor the Right respond appropriately to the current political and economic circumstances. Tea Party libertarians are manipulated by the corporatists into fretting about big government without ever seeing the loss of political and economic freedom that a pure corporatist takeover would mean. The Center-Left likes to coddle the corporatists. That’s how health care reform has become a big giveaway to the insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Those further to the Left cannot seem to escape last century’s baggage. They see the dangers of corporatism, but they seem wedded to big government as the solution.
There are other solutions, solutions that can whittle the size of government and regain control of unaccountable corporatists. We could start with serious campaign reform, something beyond the stupid, stop-gap reforms from do-gooders who think bureaucratized campaign and lobbying reporting requirements will get the job done.
We need publicly financed campaigns at all levels, and absolute limits on campaign spending. If we are going to limit corporatist power, we’ve got to eliminate the source of that power: their purchase, through campaign contributions, of the government.
We’ve got to re-open the courthouses and make corporations accountable and responsible for their actions. Tort reform was a great con, and everybody knows it. It was simply another move by the corporatists to escape all accountability, at the ballot box or the courthouse.
There are some things better done by all of us working together through what should be a universal, cooperative enterprise called government. Security is a big, good, catch-all term for what we should keep out of the hands of the corporatists. That means the military, police and fire protection, economic and consumer protections, and yes, health care.
I have great admiration for the economic wildcatters and pioneers of our past. Capitalism will work to benefit all if we will recognize that it’s the corporatist predators — not mythical socialist unicorns — who threaten it.
But to even start this discussion we’ve got to escape the dumb language of the past. It’s a fool’s game, and we’d better quit it. It’s going to take some time. Progressive candidates in 2010 can and should campaign against corruption. And corporatism is simply corruption by another name. They should stump for significant campaign reform and an end to corporate ownership of government. In other words, we can begin the real fight.
Progressives can take back the populist flag, and show enraged Americans that we’re on their side. But final victory is a long way off, and we should recognize that. Asking candidates to go all the way with us before the opinion environment is seeded — before what Feldman calls a consciousness change takes place– would not be productive. We can, however, begin.