Editor’s Note: The Texas Tribune launched today. The launch of a brand new, online news organization is itself big news. In the interests of balance, DogCanyon presents two views of The Texas Tribune, my own, and my friend and former Capitol Press Corps colleague Jim Moore’s. As with most things in politics and media, the more we talk, the better it will be. Please follow each of our pieces on the jump.
The arrival of the Texas Tribune could be the best thing that’s happened to Texas political press coverage since the old Cedar Door bar moved from 15th Street at San Antonio and away from Michelle’s Massage Parlor.
As Bill Maher says, I kid. But an aggressive new venue full of journalistic talent might just make state politics sexy again.
For too many years now the state’s newspaper and TV editors have been as disinclined to run state political stories as Capitol press habitués of the Cedar Door were to sneak next door to Michelle’s. What we’d find in the massage parlor might be entertaining, but it sure wouldn’t be news.
The trouble is, covering state politics isn’t always entertaining, but it produces news of great importance to the lives of Texans. Its decline is troubling, to say the least. Skilled and committed reporters continue to pound the beat, but there are far fewer of them, and they’re not given space and time for their work. Today’s news is more like we imagined we’d find in the massage parlor: tarted-up old tricks that aren’t going to change anyone’s life.
The Tribune is the brainchild of John Thornton, a savvy businessman and investor who cares deeply about public interest journalism and the future of Texas. Editor in Chief Evan Smith has guided Texas Monthly brilliantly for years. Managing Editor Ross Ramsey is unequaled in fairness and in knowledge of state government and politics.
Thornton believes the era of new media has doomed the old for-profit news model. So he and his colleagues have put together a non-profit model for public interest journalism. Financially speaking, their goals are modest. Compared, say, to the $20 million Texans give annually to ballet troupes, they don’t need much. Art is important to democracy, but independent journalism is essential. I can imagine a democracy without Swan Lake. We can’t have a democracy without independent journalists.
The Tribune folk believe in the power of transparency, and they are walking the walk. They are up-front about the Trib’s finances. They have already spent a good deal of time and money putting together public interest databases (campaign contributions; legislative voting records) of use to reporters and interested citizens. They are offering their work free to media outlets everywhere.
It is coverage of state politics that’s suffered most from the decline of the news business. In a state big as Texas, the consequences are tragic. Studies show that more than 75 percent of what citizens know about state issues comes from paid political ads. I’ve made such ads. Believe me, you don’t want to bet your future on their objectivity.
In January, Governing Magazine published a story about the collapse of statehouse reporting. “Newspapers that once sent five people to cover state government are down to two and are pruning the space they get on the page; smaller papers have bailed out entirely,” wrote Rob Gurwitz.
Texas has been hit particularly hard, and I know from months of talking with Thornton, Smith and Ramsey that they launched the Texas Tribune to help solve this problem. All of them recognized the consequences for Texas of a poorly-informed citizenry. They couldn’t have better intentions, and they couldn’t have put together a better team to carry out those intentions.
We launched DogCanyon.org for much the same reason, though we have far more modest goals and come at the problem differently (and with a lot less money!).
There’s something essentially Texan about the Tribune. Its cause is noble and its manner entrepreneurial. They are, in a sense, journalistic wildcatters. They are open-range journalists. If they succeed, we will all be a little better off. Newspapers may once again give space, time and resources to the talented political reporters still in their employ. Competition will drive increased coverage, and increased coverage will mean Texans make better political judgments.
I have the luxury of not needing to decide whether a for-profit online news model is more viable than the Tribune’s non-profit model. I just want more reporters, more editors, more stories. The Tribune’s going to give me that.
One last thing. All writers ought to be happy there’s a new venue paying real money for their toil. It’s a small pool at the moment, but if it succeeds, there will be others. I know too many reporters and writers who are struggling to make ends meet. Publishers have gotten off cheaply, because most journalists love what they do. Publishers act like that love is some kind of perk they give their writers, when really it’s that love that made publishing a success.

Down in H-Town another website launched today …www.culturemap.com. Some Houston Chronicle exes on board. It’s lifestyle/news/arts. I am writing real estate column for them, the first one is about The Heights.
http://www.culturemap.com/newsdetail/09-30-09-hijacking-the-heights/
Best,
Ralph
Congratulations, and the site and its “mapazine” concept are both great. Great work, Ralph.
I remember one time when I was at the Cedar Door – about 19 years old – and someone from Michelle’s Massage Parlor (I won’t mention any names, even though it was more than 30 years ago) was standing on a table to change a light bulb. She was wearing a short skirt. As to whether she was wearing anything under it, well, you know, I do remember the incident after all this time. But that does not make us informed citizens.