Rick Perry and David Medina
Texas Supreme Court Justice David Medina, who was once indicted in an arson case, was Gov. Rick Perry’s general counsel when Perry denied a stay of execution to Cameron Todd Willingham. Willingham received the death penalty for the alleged arson deaths of his three daughters. Perry appointed Medina to the high court in November, 2004. In a controversial 2007 case involving the burning of their home, Medina and his wife were indicted — and subsequently cleared — in connection with a fire experts ruled was arson. They were accused of tampering with the evidence.
Significantly, the Medinas based their defense on criticism of arson investigators, the same kind of criticism that’s been leveled against those who investigated Willingham in the house fire in which his three children were killed.
It is not known what role Medina may have played in the governor’s office deliberations in the Willingham case. It is not known because Perry has refused to disclose any information about those deliberations. Medina’s possible involvement would be extremely embarrasing for Perry and his office.
A Harris County grand jury indicted Medina and his wife in connection with the 2007 fire that destroyed their home in Spring, Texas. Then-Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal moved immediately to have the indictments against his fellow Republicans dismissed. At the time, Rosenthal himself was embroiled in a controversy that led to his resignation.
On February 17, 2004, An arson expert delivered a fax to Perry’s office questioning the evidence against Willingham just 88 minutes before he was executed. As general counsel, Medina would have been in a position to have received and reviewed the fax.
Francisca Medina was re-indicted after the initial indictments were thrown out. In August, her indictment was dismissed. Listen to her attorney Dick DeGuerin:
“We laid all our cards on the table and let the prosecutor interview our two witnesses, who say there is no way this is arson,” said Medina’s attorney, Dick DeGuerin. “Our guys collected much more evidence than the fire marshal’s office did. They collected evidence that is indicative, but not conclusory, of an electrical fire.”
“[Medina and DeGuerin's experts] were very critical of the fire marshal’s office for their failure to look at other possibilities and to follow other leads,” DeGuerin said.
How about that. A powerful person connected to the governor can get arson experts involved to question the work of a fire marshall’s arson investigators. Willingham wasn’t so privileged.
Medina was experiencing severe financial troubles at the time his house burned down. After the indictment against his wife was dismissed in August, Justice Medina issued a statement thanking God that justice was served.
If it turns out Medina — a man who escaped legal accountability through claims of a flawed arson investigation – was responsible for turning away evidence of a flawed arson investigation in a capital murder case, Perry and his administration, to say nothing of the Texas Supreme Court on which Medina still sits, would be deeply embarrassed.
Now, it remains possible that Medina was so new to the job in February, 2004, that he played little role in the Willingham case. Since he would have been in charge of the governor’s office handling of such a matter, it’s likely he was involved. We don’t know, however, because Perry has decided to keep secret all documents related to the deliberations.
I think we may know why.
UPDATE: Clarified that Medina was indicted for tampering with evidence in the arson.
Tricky Rick Perry has some questions that need be answered. Why is he so secretive? He has his staff delete all his email every seven days. The only people I know that do that (in relationship to their jobs) are people engaged in illegal activity.
This just keeps getting worse. Hopefully it also keeps getting more and more “uncovered.” We really do need to know what Perry actually did in making his decision to deny the stay. And what he’s done since, in order to keep that information from the public.
To my way of thinking, Perry went full I’m-not-a-crook-Nixon today. It’s a clear sign that a) this thing is getting to him and b) there’s something to it.
Otherwise, Perry would have dribbled out some memo from some other expert that got him off the hook. He doesn’t have one, it appears.
I hope the remainders of our news media (sigh) will see this for what it was. When the pig squeals, that means you hurt him. Keep sticking him.
What is it with Texas governors and their Mexican lawyers? i.e. like Bush and Gonzales. They say that the people in Texas support the death penalty. That may well be true but do they support outright disrespect for the citizens’ rights and a governor who would not do all that is possible to save the life of one of “HIS” citizens? Is this his idea of being tough on crime? Justice means you try equally as hard to see if a person may be innocent.
“Ricky’s Full of Shift”
http://poetictimes.com/poem/New/Ricky's_Full_of_Shift.html?id=50618
I am a lawyer and was the assistant foreman of the first grand jury that indicted Medina and his wife. (Medina asked the 263rd District Court in Houston to jail me for having the temerity to publicly object to Rosenthal’s dismissal of the indictments.) In all Medina’s trumpeting of his innocence and what a \mockery of justice\ our grand jury made by indicting him, the one thing that has never been released to the media is the letter Medina presented to investigators that was the basis of the evidence tampering charge we handed down. Release THAT, Justice Medina, and let the public judge for itself whether you tampered with the evidence. So far, every request for that letter has been met with only deafening silence.
Thanks for another informative blog. Where else could I get that kind of information written in such a perfect way? I have a project that I'm just now working on, and I've been on the look out for such information.
Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks
This is a serious case. It is not nice that people have to be given the death sentance
I went to junior high and high school with David. He’s arrogant and self-serving and very likely has his sight set on the White House. He’s a snake that doesn’t need to be in office.
I cant believe this what a powerful and very suprised reactions by Perry
Thanks for interesting infos
Рада Встрече с Вами!
Хочу представить последний ловкий сервис написания рефератов, диссертаций и контрольных.
Именно тут однако самое лучшее view-security.info
Подскажите, пожалуйста, идеальную тему реферата по экономике.Чтобы была актуальной и интересной, но не банальной. Можно, чтобы она имела отношение к кризису в настоящее время. Заранее всем спасибо!за какое время обанкротить страну (по кол ву населения)Тема: Кризис. Если еще раскроете причины и виновников кризиса то будет вообще отлично!